For the love of God – Part 5: Reflecting God’s Love in… Church Discipline
Posted: November 23, 2011 Filed under: Articles, Church, Gospel 1 Comment »Part 5: Reflecting God’s Love in… Church Discipline
I once worked at a church in which there was a major sin being committed between multiple members. These sins were rebuked by the pastor behind closed doors but never made public or disciplined formally by the church. Even as a wet behind the ears youth pastor, I felt as if there was something wrong about how it was handled. Sadly, this lack of discipline is running rampant in churches across the world. Sins are either overlooked or the offenders are slapped on the wrist and told to “do better.”
In reading the New Testament, there seems to be no such thing as a church without discipline. This principle is taught by Jesus (Matt. 18:15-20) and is seemingly commonplace for New Testament churches, most clearly described in Paul’s first letter to the church at Corinth (1 Cor. 5). Jesus and Paul both agreed that where there is church, there is discipline.
In his fantastic book, Christian Fellowship, John A. James lists five Biblical instances that require church discipline:
- Scandalous vices and immoralities (1 Cor. 5:11-13).
- Denial of Christian doctrine (Gal. 1:8, 1 Tim. 6:35).
- Causing division (Tit. 3:10).
- Failure to provide for near relatives (1 Tim. 5:8).
- Unreconciled enmity (Matt. 18:7).
Of course, this list does not fully cover or typify the random issues pastors deal with. Many times there are areas that require personal discernment based on conscience. Regardless, discipline has an essential role in church affairs according to Scripture.
Let’s look at the two most particular ways that church discipline is an act of love between the church and its members.
To Keep the Body Pure
Paul makes it clear that any sin that occurs in the body of Christ can be devastating to the whole body (1 Cor. 5:6-8). Jesus came to die on the cross in order to save His people and present them as pure and without blemish (Eph. 5:27, Col. 1:22). How can His church be pure and beautiful, the way He designed it to be, if there is unrepentant sin being flaunted and unchallenged?
Simply put, the real problem is that church discipline is seen as hurtful instead of helpful. Christianity is often portrayed, and rightly so, as a faith of grace but widely ignored is the deserved wrath that believers are saved from. Perhaps the ignored and downplayed Final Judgment causes us to overlook the more minute judgments in the church is given authority to make as the representative of God’s Kingdom (Matt. 18:18, 1 Cor. 5:12).
To Return the Offender to Repentance
Paul is also very forthright in his belief that removal from the church is carried out in hopes that the person removed will realize the severity of their sin (1 Cor. 5:5). This act of “turning him over to Satan” gives the offender the opportunity to see what it is like outside of the grace and love of God’s assembly.
It is not loving to allow a brother or sister to wallow in their sins undisputed. As God judges those who sin against Him, He lovingly convicts His people through the Holy Spirit in order to produce mature fruit in us. Discipline in the church results in life within the body. As we are holy internally, we display holiness externally as a declaration of love to the world. There is no greater way to display God’s love than to radiate His very character for all the world to see. Some of the greatest stories of repentance and rejuvenation began with a person being held accountable for their actions.
Christians are largely seen as hypocritical and no different than society. One possible solution to this evangelism-wrecking persona is to glorify God’s justice while simultaneously bringing to light the destructive nature of unrepented sin. Consider yourselves challenged.
May we model God’s love both in grace and in justice.
For the Love of God – Part 4: Reflecting God’s Love in… Church Membership
Posted: November 22, 2011 Filed under: Articles, Church, Gospel 1 Comment »Part 4: Reflecting God’s Love in… Church Membership
For most, church membership is a box to check off the proverbial church to-do list. It is a tradition, a felt obligation, or a way to meet people and get “plugged-in.” What if church membership is more? What if church membership is part of God’s design in manifesting His love through the church?
You see, church membership is not specifically listed in the New Testament by name but it is certainly implied in many ways:
- Elders are given an office of authority to oversee the flock and are held accountable for their souls (Matt. 18:18-20, Acts 20:28, 1 Tim. 3:5, Heb. 13:17, 1 Pet. 5:2-4).
- Believers are seen as fellowshipping both at the temple (a designated place of worship) and in their homes (Acts 2:42-47).
- Believers are to exercise gifts as individual members of one local body (1 Cor. 12).
- There was a sinful person “among them” that was disciplined out of the group and the church carries out discipline and accountability (Matt. 18:15-20, 1 Cor. 5, 1 Cor, 6:15).
There are several other passages that could be added here, but this is a concise portrait of a group of people worshiping and living life together in a group setting. All through the Old Testament it is a major aspect of a believer’s life to go to the temple for worship and the New Testament consistently gives instruction to churches by letters written to them and their leaders.
The Kingdom of God
It is possibly a less “gray area” approach to church membership by saying that God’s work is done through the local church comprised of believers. Believers are adopted into God’s family (Rom. 8:15, Eph. 5:1) to receive His blessings (Eph. 1:14) and do His work (Eph. 2:10). Simply put, if we are God’s people then we are called to act like His people. This means that the life of a believer is now bound to advancing His Kingdom rather than the world. We are identified and called out (the Greek word ekklesia, meaning “assembly”) through our new lives in Christ. This call of God is a call of gracious love to His chosen people that should cause them to enact the same gracious love to the lost souls of the world.
Church membership is a covenant to God’s Kingdom work. Jesus specifically gives the keys to this Kingdom to His followers (Matt. 16:19) and tells them that this a blood covenant (Matt. 26:28). As with all divine covenants in Scripture, God establishes His Kingdom through these promises to His people. It is safe to assume that Paul and the other apostles were not mistaken in establishing local church gatherings everywhere they went. These gatherings, and still are, the perfect place to love one another and be loved by the leaders God has placed over you.
Without the church, there is no place for elders to teach and oversee or for believers to worship, fellowship, and provide accountability to one another on an organized and consistent basis. The question is not whether or not the church is important. The question is whether or not believers find it important enough to commit to.
___
Up Next: Part 5: Reflecting God’s Love in: Church Discipline
For the Love of God – Part 3: Reflecting God’s Love in… Community Engagement
Posted: November 21, 2011 Filed under: Articles, Church, Gospel 1 Comment »Part 3: Reflecting God’s Love in… Community Engagement
There are numerous evangelistic models that are being used in the church today. Everything from inviting people to service by offering them entrance into a raffle for a free car (which I do not recommend) to encouraging members to invite friends to special events (which has some positives to it). Regardless of your style or combining of these methods, one thing cannot be forgotten: loving and showing Christ to the community was the paramount aim of the New Testament church.
The First Church
The first instance in which Scripture talks about gathered believers post-Resurrection is in Acts 2:42-47:
“They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. And awe came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles. And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.”
This church did not only meet at the building of worship, they met in their homes. They lived life together. This was not a once a week social club, this was a lifestyle. They had several key distinctives:
- They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching.
- They devoted themselves to fellowship.
- They devoted themselves to prayer (imagine that!).
- They had all things in common (they shared all property and possessions).
- They sold their belongings and gave to all who had need.
- They attended the temple and their homes together daily.
- They received food with glad hearts and praised God for it.
- They had favor with all people.
Take a moment to ponder what it would be like for your church to live this list out regularly. Notice that verse 47 says that people were being saved daily – just by watching these people live their lives! There was no magic formula and no persuasive gimmicks; they simply loved God and loved others. I’m confident that it wasn’t easy to love every one that they came across, but the Gospel was more important to them. Christ is manifested through His church and lives can and will be transformed through His people. Let us remember this, though: The Gospel will need to be clearly voiced in order for your community to understand why you live this way.
Contextualizing without Compromising
It is vital to be aware of the context that your church is in. We can be effective in “fitting in” with our community while simultaneously “standing out” from it. For example, if your church is in an area that is 68% Hispanic, you want to intentionally reach them through Spanish ministries, culturally aware events, etc. If your church is in an 88% upper-class Caucasian neighborhood, your church should look much different. The point is, if you are trying to play an eight-track in a CD player, you’re not going to hear music anytime soon. One great lie of Satan is that we have to be so counter-cultural that we hide inside our buildings and wait for people to conform the image we want to project.
That said, it is even more vital to understand that God is sovereign and your efforts are not. You may attempt all the tricks and your church could still close. God’s Word is ageless and not culturally bound, therefore it can and must be preached the same everywhere. Paul provides a great example of this in Acts 17:22-34. Paul is sensitive and aware of the Athenians’ customs, but in the end he tells them that “the God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of Heaven and Earth, does not live in temples made by man, nor is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything.” Paul is clearly uncompromising on his presentation of God. Let there be no contextualizing that does not include the clear proclamation of the Gospel and the need for salvation.
Meeting Needs
In the end, your community should know that you exist and feel the weight of their need for the God you are preaching. The culture today wants answers more than anything else. There is a desperate need and thirst for truth and the church has to be the answer. Where the church fails, society will fail. If the church isn’t meeting needs, the world will find a place to have them met. If someone is hungry they may feel the need to steal food, so be the ones to provide it. If someone feels depressed and is suicidal, be the place of refuge through the reflection of hope in God. The list could on, but you get the point.
Remember that the New Testament is largely written to churches and/or their pastors and the apostles’ missionary expeditions typically ended with the establishment of a church. The church is the heartbeat of evangelistic discipleship.
Meditate on this question: If your church’s doors closed tomorrow, would your community notice?
___
Up Next: Part 4: Reflecting God’s Love in… Church Membership
For the Love of God – Part 2: Reflecting God’s Love in… Pastoral Leadership
Posted: November 20, 2011 Filed under: Articles, Church, Gospel Leave a comment »Part 2: Reflecting God’s Love in… Pastoral Leadership
It is imperative to understand that there was no greater man than the God-man, Jesus Christ. I am aware that this should go without saying, but unfortunately many pastors spend more time attempting to mimic their favorite popular preacher than reading Jesus as revealed in Scripture. “Pastor” can be translated to “shepherd” and Jesus is, of course, the Great Shepherd (Heb. 13:20).
The truth is that if your ministry is built around an impersonation of another man, you are only fooling your people and yourself into thinking you are something that you’re not. Furthermore, being a charismatic speaker in your own right or excelling as a budget-setter are not enough to see lives transformed. Your people need a pastor, not a hip motivational speaker. You must love them with the passionate love of God, doing everything in your power to show them the Gospel with nothing added to it.
Of course, at the end of the day pastors cannot do anything to save a soul, but they can preach and live Scripturally in hopes that God uses them. Our standard is fully laid out in Scripture through Jesus Christ and through the letters of His chosen apostle, Paul.
Jesus’ Example
There are several characteristics of Jesus Christ that encompass what it means to be a man of God. Here are three that I found to be of particular interest:
- Compassionate – Jesus not only felt compassion for the hurting (Matt. 14:14), but also felt compassion for unbelievers (Mark 6:34). It is crucial that we see the lost as souls in need of a Savior and nothing less. When dealing with unbelievers, also remember that we are saved by God’s grace and mercy, not by fear-mongering or intimidation.
- A Humble Servant – If anyone has the right to forgo humility, it’s the God of the Universe. But Jesus did not see it this way, going so far as to wash His disciples’ feet in order to set an example for them to follow (John 13:1-17). Not only this, but Jesus was willing to lower Himself in order to save others (Mark 15). The best leaders are not dictators; they lead by example and serve others.
- Defensive of God’s Name and Honor – Jesus was humble and compassionate, but He was not a choir boy. He did not allow His Father to be disrespected (Matt. 21:12-13). Notice in the aforementioned verse that Jesus’ confrontation did not scare people away, it drew people toward Him. Don’t be a jerk, but preach with conviction and people will believe in you enough to follow the One you’re heralding.
Paul’s Exhortation
Paul, the greatest church planter that the world will ever see, used many characteristics of Jesus and general attributes of mature faith as guidelines for elder qualifications in 1 Timothy 3:2-7:
“An overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God’s church? He must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil.”
Pretty self-explanatory, I’d say.
The Word is Enough
The Bible is the perfect, unblemished, inerrant Word of God. This is where pastors direly need to turn for answers to all questions relating to ministry. It is great that God has used men to grow churches, to preach the Gospel, and to impact the world for Christ. It should bring us joy to see God’s Kingdom work being done, but it should not breed a want for someone else’s God-ordained abilities. God’s love is unending, contagious, and powerful and Christ’s perfect reflection of this love should be our standard in church leadership. You cannot show love to someone more than by showing them Christ (1 John 4:9-10).
As Jared Wilson has so aptly put it, “Someone will always have better coffee, music, facilities, and speaking. Showcase Christ and His Gospel. No one can improve on that.”
___
Up Next: Part 3: Reflecting God’s Love in… Community Engagement
For the Love of God – Part 1: God’s Redemptive Love for the Church
Posted: November 19, 2011 Filed under: Articles, Church, Gospel Leave a comment »Part 1: God’s Redemptive Love for the Church
History has an impeccable way of giving mankind a glimpse of what to expect in the future. As mankind experiences the thrill of a job well-done and the misery of a decision gone wrong, we find that history is the greatest teacher. Empirical knowledge allows us to go left instead of right, to vote yes instead of no, and to prepare for the worst. Any gray-haired veteran of life will take every opportunity to tell you, “Don’t do what I did.”
In the same way, Biblical history teaches us about ourselves, our condition, and our God. If there is a lesson to be learned or a false step to be taken, the pages of Scripture reveal the outcome and afford us the opportunity to attempt at avoiding disaster. Perhaps the most beautiful picture of this, to me, is God’s covenantal love for His Church. Above all else, the Bible is a sixty-six book love letter written to us from God revealing who He is in relation to who we are. That is, that He is infinitely holy, glorious, loving, and just. These attributes are played out over and over as He deals with those He calls His own. If we allow the knowledge of the history of God’s love to lead our churches forward, we may be able to position ourselves in a way to best affect our city, our country, and our world. After all, understanding God’s immutable attributes allows us to respond appropriately in every aspect of our lives.
In order to fully understand this concept, let’s take a walk through the pages of Scripture.
Genesis 12:2-3
God appears to Abram, later Abraham, and makes a promise to him:
“I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, andin you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
The Lord is making a covenant with Abraham and is essentially saying, “Everything that happened in the Garden is going to be fixed through you.” The Kingdom of God is coming, through a chosen people, to redeem mankind to the perfect shalom it was created for. Redemption is being set in motion.
Deuteronomy 7:7-8
God makes another proclamation of covenantal promise to His people by referring to the original promise He made to Abraham and the patriarchs:
“It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the LORD set His love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples, but it is because the LORD loves you and is keeping the oath that He swore to your fathers, that the LORD has brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. Know therefore that the LORD your God is God, the faithful God who keeps covenant and steadfast love with those who love Him and keep His commandments, to a thousand generations.”
The Lord is a faithful God, who keeps His promises and never lies (Titus 1:2). God chose to free Israel frombondage not because of any merit of their own (sound familiar?), but because He is a God who can do all things but one: lie. Redemption is given through freedom from slavery.
Matthew 16:15-18
Jesus, the in-the-flesh fulfillment of God’s promises, makes a vital declaration to His disciples:
“[Jesus] said to them, ‘But who do you say that I am?’ Simon Peter replied, ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ And Jesus answered him, ‘Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in Heaven.’And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.’”
First, remember that Jesus chose His disciples, not vice-versa. As His chosen disciples, they are heirs to God’s promise to Abraham in Genesis 12. The Kingdom of God, a blessing to all nations, would continue to be established by the faith of God’s chosen people. Redemption will come through the incarnate God Himself.
Romans 5:8
Paul sums the fulfillment of Jesus’ Matthew 16 statement like this:
“God shows His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
The covenant between God and Abraham is fulfilled once and for all in the death, burial, and resurrection of the awaited Messiah. Redemption has a name: Jesus Christ.
The Role of the Church
Of course, the Church is the body of God’s chosen people, but the local church is a centralized representative of this body. As God’s children saved by grace through faith, we reflect and bear the image of Jesus Christ, who reflected God perfectly in every way (Eph. 4:24, Col. 1:15).
As Jesus has given us the keys to His Kingdom, we are the torch-bearers of the fulfilled promise of Genesis 12. We are commanded to reach the nations with the Gospel, teaching everyone about this great salvation (Matt. 28:19). Do not be fooled, the Bible is about God. It is His Kingdom that is unfolding. He just loves us enough to prepare good works for us in the midst of it (Eph. 1:3-14).
The church is the cornerstone of God’s work in creation, as history has shown us, and this series will tackle what this reflection of divine love looks like missionally.
___
Up Next - Part 2: Reflecting God’s Love in… Pastoral Leadership
Beauty and the Gospel
Posted: January 30, 2011 Filed under: Articles | Tags: Beauty, Gospel 1 Comment »In her chapter for the book For the Beauty of the Church Catholic artist and journalist Barbara Nicolosi gives us three elements that make up the nature of beauty (quoting Thomas Aquinas). They are:
- Wholeness
- Harmony
- Radiance
The Elements of Beauty
Wholeness, says Nicolosi, “means that nothing is missing.” This element plays itself out in two ways. First, for something to be whole, it cannot have anything missing. A beautiful object is sufficient in itself—all necessary elements are accounted for. To use Nicolosi’s example, “people don’t listen to Mozart’s Ave Verum and say, ‘Needs another high G in there. Oh well.’” Second, in order to be whole, beauty cannot be gratuitous. In other words, a beautiful object is efficient. So, when we see something beautiful, we see something complete and whole. To adopt biblical language, there is nothing to add or take away.
Harmony is the sense that “all of those parts that are present are related to one another in a complementary relationship.” Each piece functions exactly as it is supposed to function, and relates to all the other pieces exactly as it was meant to relate. Harmony is community (of persons or elements) as it was meant to be. This is why the biblical vision of gospel community is beautiful. The way it is lived out in this life may be messy, but it is beautiful in pointing toward the future community free of sin. And in its future fullness, biblical community will be utterly beautiful.
These two words, when together, illustrate the biblical concept of shalom, the harmonious wholeness of God’s intentions for how things are supposed to be. No wonder, then, that some would include them in their definition of beautiful. Beauty takes us beyond ourselves and our present circumstances, and transports us into a picture of what things were supposed to be and what God promises he will restore them to. These two elements are not all there is to beauty in Aquinas’ view, however.
Radiance, the third and final element, “communicates something profound to us, some kind of moral, spiritual, or intellectual enlightenment.” Or, to put it another way, beauty has a message to be proclaimed. For Nicolosi, this proclamation is personal. We hint at this element when we say that a sunset, painting, music, etc. speaks to us or moves us. And this message affects us.
When these three elements combine in an act of beauty we see a peculiar result: Humility. The great splendor of the thing reminds us of our smallness. I think I’m paraphrasing John Piper when I say no one stands at the edge of the grand canyon and proclaims how great they are. They stand in awe of the beauty of what stands before them; beauty that is large, weighty, and absolutely outside of themselves.
This beauty-wrought humility can, when rightly understand, serve a redemptive focus. I don’t mean that beauty, itself abstractly, redeems us, but it serves as a redemptive metaphor. As Nicolosi says, [beauty] “subverts the problem of the garden of Eden.” The Fall came about as Adam and Eve rebelled by rejecting their creaturelyness. They wanted to be like God, and so on have we all down through the generations. “But,” argues Nicolosi, “the beautiful makes us content in our creaturehood: ‘I’m small, and that’s okay.’”
The Beauty of the Gospel
I’m not going to argue over whether you should adopt this definition of beauty or not. Rather, I want to bring out, assuming these elements, the beauty of the gospel.
When it comes to a crucifixion no one would argue for beauty in an aesthetic sense. The form of a broken, bled-out human being certainly isn’t pleasing to the eye. And this lack of beauty is most true particularly in a crucifixion where the death sentence is piggy-backed onto a miscarriage of justice. But here, in the gospel account, is kingdom subversion. In one of the most brutal acts of physical horror and treachery on a cosmic scale, God weaves together the elements of beauty. Consider:
Wholeness – in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, there is not one aspect that is missing. Sin is wholely dealt with in such a way that people can be wholely saved, and the whole universe will be wholely restored. Jesus’ substitutionary (in our place) death, burial and resurrection is sufficient to cover all of our sins. But it is also efficient – there is nothing gratuitous in Jesus’ suffering. This is astounding, as we see the level of physical, emotional, and spiritual horror in the acts of flogging, crucifixion, and alienation from God while taking on the fullness of God’s wrath for all of our sins. How is this not gratuitous? Because, for sin to be forgiven, it must be paid for. And for all of our sins to be forgiven, they must all be paid for. Jesus did not face an ounce of wrath more than what our sins fully deserved, but how much wrath they did deserve! For such suffering to be efficient, our sins must be far greater than we tend to believe.
Harmony – in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, every part and element of the gospel relate and play off one another in exactly the way that they were meant to, and in exactly the way that was necessary for redemption to be accomplished. There is no gospel without Jesus’ death. That was the penalty par-excellence of sin – physical and spiritual death, and separation from God. On the cross, Jesus felt the weight of each, in our place. There is also no gospel without Jesus’ burial. To have no burial is to have a savior who got off the cross. The burial of Jesus stands defiantly in the face of those who said Jesus didn’t really die on the cross, as if first century people were too ignorant to know whether someone had died or not. And, of course, there is no gospel without Jesus’ resurrection. Without it, our faith, says Paul, is in vain. If there is no resurrection, we are left in our sins, and death is still reigning undefeated.
Radiance – in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, there is a message of hope which radiates. Sin is the great human problem, because it places us out of God’s favor and under his wrath, severing our relationship with him. But in the Gospel, there is a message which comes to us personally and corporately that God is setting things right. He does this personally, with us, through the work of his son. The gospel calls us to place our trust and faith in Jesus and his death, burial, and resurrection in our place so that we can have all of our sins forgiven, our relationship with God restored, and the promise that one day, we will live as God intended, in his presence forever, free of sin, death, and pain.
And even in the horror of crucifixion, that is beautiful.
Image by Wolfgang Staudt.
Baylor and Berkeley: A Liberal Pushback
Posted: June 16, 2010 Filed under: Articles, News & Commentary 1 Comment »
College football in America was rocked to the core by recent news of conference expansion and realignment. Moderate spectators and rabid fans alike were no doubt anxiously anticipating the outcome of these sudden developments. With Nebraska’s departure to the Big Ten Conference and Colorado to the PAC-10 Conference, the Big 12 Conference was rumored to likely dissolve quickly thereafter, with Texas and and handful other Big 12 schools possibly headed to the PAC-10.
One of the teams looking to follow the money train to the PAC-10 was Baylor University. Texas Governor Rick Perry has been vocal about his preference that Baylor be included in any conference realignment that also includes the other Texas teams in the Big 12 – Texas, Texas A&M, and Texas Tech. Furthermore, Baylor launched an all-out effort in the Texas Legislature to make certain that they were included in the move to the PAC-10.
Orangebloods.com reported last week that this effort seems to be falling short. Originally, Colorado, with its Denver television market, had agreed to leave the Big 12 leaving Baylor as the odd-man out. What’s more, the website also cited sources stating that “some schools in the Pac-10, including California-Berkeley, have a real issue with adding an institution with religious ties like Baylor to the conference.”
Should this be a surprise? Probably not. California-Berkeley has never been shy about its liberal bent. In 2005, the school’s website posted an article stating that only 12% of the incoming freshman population considered itself to be conservative on such issues as abortion and same-sex marriage. Liberalism continues to subvert our country through many avenues, now college football can be included.
Ultimately, the dust settled and the Big 12 stayed together with ten teams and a great sigh of relief was heard around the sports world coming out of Waco. Sadly, Baylor would have been jobbed otherwise. Not because of their football record, their academic status, or their potential revenue. No, they would be pushed out because of their ties to Jesus Christ.
Good luck to Colorado, the cultural and economic fit for the PAC-10.
Gores Headed for Divorce: Could the SBC Have Saved Them?
Posted: June 8, 2010 Filed under: Articles, News & Commentary, SBC Leave a comment »As Vice-President of the United States, Al Gore and his wife Tipper were in the public eye more often than most couples in the 1990s. With paparazzi always lurking, the Gores were consistently seen as the quintessential couple by the world, especially in the wake of the well-documented marital affair of Bill Clinton. Of the two families, it seemed the Clintons would be the likely candidates to eventually split. While the Clinton marriage remains strong, as least in public, it has been reported that Al and Tipper are calling it quits.
As a rising star in the political world, Al Gore was widely known as a Baptist. Receiving less attention, however, was his apparent disdain for the Southern Baptist Convention. Though baptized in a Southern Baptist church, Gore always maintained his allegiance to the church he grew up in, New Salem Missionary Baptist Church in Carthage, Tennessee. New Salem Missionary has never been affiliated with the SBC.
During a 2002 interview with Newsweek, Gore stated, “I am a Christian. I am a Protestant. I am a Baptist.” In an interview published in the New Yorker in 2004, Al and Tipper exposed that they had disassociated themselves with the SBC due to its conservative bent, citing that they felt that the denomination was intolerant and hyper-fundamentalist.
Their contempt for conservatism begs the question: Could an acceptance of the SBC’s standards saved their marriage? It is no secret that the SBC stands by the Biblical view on divorce, standing on the foundation laid by Jesus in Matthew 19:6 and 5:32. Jesus commands in Matthew 19:6, “So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.”
Gore further stated in the New Yorker interview that he was “ecumenical now.” He also revealed that he was not a fan of the public faith regarding global religions that then-President George W. Bush had shown: “You don’t hear very much from them about the Sermon on the Mount, you don’t hear very much about the teachings of Jesus on giving to the poor, or the beatitudes. It’s the vengeance, the brimstone.”
Of course, no one may truly know what happened behind closed doors in the Gore household and we can only pray and hope as the body of Christ that they can reconcile. However, their open lean towards Liberalism may have left them open to real danger in their marriage. Instead of seemingly only focusing on the social justice of the Gospels, perhaps they should also set their sights on other parts of Scripture that may seem a bit too “conservative,” like the sanctity of marriage.
AG Holder Avoids Radical Islam Questions
Posted: May 15, 2010 Filed under: Articles, News & Commentary 1 Comment »While testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Eric Holder hesitated to answer whether or not radical Islam was the motivating factor behind the slew of terrorist attacks attempted on our country recently.
Republican Lamar Smith of Texas asked him pointedly, more than once, “But radical Islam could have been one of the reasons?”
Holder followed, more than once, “There are a variety of reasons.”
It seemed as though Holder would have preferred a surgical operation with no anesthesia than speak the words “radical Islam.” Undoubtedly, it is the job of our government to worry less about the sensitivities of the Muslims in our country and voice aloud the dangers we as a nation are facing. Men like Albert Mohler and Franklin Graham have been blasted by the media for standing against Islamic terrorism, but they are right in attempting to draw attention to this critical national topic. Christians today must stand in the face of injustice and terrorism.
There have been numerous issue-dodging quotes from Holder of late. Some go so far as to try and defend Islam, further appeasing Muslims and sidetracking Americans. He recently claimed that al Qaeda recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki teaches “a version of Islam that is not consistent with the teachings of it.” This is the same al Qaeda recruiter who has mentored some of the 9/11 terrorists and the “Christmas Day bombing.” This administration is dangerously downplaying the dangers of radical Islam and is essentially pandering to the very men who are threatening the United States the most.
Recently, Alan Colmes has defended Holder, stating, “There is not such a thing as radical Islam … People are not doing this in the name of Islam.” Though Colmes makes an attempt at bailing Holder out, it still does not help the situation. Holder did not avoid the question because of his belief that radical Islam does not exist; he was clearly trying to keep the status quo and not offend anyone directly. Perhaps he would be applauded for being non-combatant on this issue if it we had not already experienced 9/11 and recent bombings in the name of Islamic jihad; but we have had to deal with them and they must, in turn, be dealt with by those sworn to protect us.
The 21st century is bringing about the most dangerous rise in Liberalism that the United States has ever seen. Life is being devalued, marriage is being compromised, truth is being subjectified, and now violent religions are being pacified. The question for American Christians is this: What are we to do with the chief lawyer of our country avoiding to speak about such an important national safety and religious issue?
The only thing Christians truly can do is pray for this country and its leaders. There is no greater threat to our country than the saints not seeking the Lord in this critical time. It is of no gain to protest, insult, or act violently in any way towards Muslims or the United States government. Though we are temped by the flesh to act out in anger and pride over this issue, we cannot. We can, however, join together as the family of God and promote a revival of prayer and promotion of truth in an age trying to suppress it.
We must further understand that Scripture is clear that God is ultimately in control of the government’s actions. As laid out in Proverbs 21:1: “The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; he turns it wherever he will.” It’s imperative that Evangelicalism today does not forget their Creator’s hand in all things. We should stand up for truth, battling side by side for the safety of our country and doctrines of our faith, but we should also trust that the Lord has a plan for this administration.
This administration is facing a litany of decisions that could make or break the future of this country. Will they make the moves necessary to stop these violent religious attacks, or will they continue to satisfy the hearts of the wicked? There is no way to know how the next four years will play out. Perhaps the Lord will do a great work and reveal the necessary steps to President Obama, Attorney General Holder, and the rest of these leaders.
More importantly, though, will you pray for God’s hand to lead them to right action?














Ethics: How Should Christians Respond to the Proposition 8 Debate?
Posted: August 13, 2010 | Author: Brandon Smith | Filed under: Articles, Ethics, News & Commentary | 1 Comment »Unless you live under a rock, you have seen the latest news on the Proposition 8 case. Last week, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled that Proposition 8 violates the constitution, a ruling that could potentially overturn the California voters’ decision that same-sex marriage should remain illegal.
Expectedly, Judge Walker’s decision has flared much debate over the issue of homosexuality. Many Christians, though not all, have been up in arms for years over the idea that same-sex marriage will be made legal nationally, and decisions like this could propel that concern to a reality. It is not outlandish to presume that if votes can be motioned to essentially be counted void, it’s only a matter of time before the federal process of voting will be undermined under the pressure of protesting nationwide. In fact, we may already be there.
Furthermore, the ruling states that Proposition 8 is nothing more than the brainchild of the “private moral view that same-sex couples are inferior to opposite-sex couples,” attributing this to such groups as conservative Christianity, and says that such a view has no place in law. To put it bluntly, this ruling insinuates that Christians should have no right of conscience to discuss or debate their concerns or beliefs. Never mind the fact that 44 states have specific laws that establish marriage as a union between one man and one woman. It is also ironic that the “private moral view” of Judge Walker allows him to impose on law. These loopholes make a mockery of the voting system.
Simply put, this is a debate that includes conservative Christians but is not at all limited to Christian thought. We are not alone in the outrage at Judge Walker’s ruling. In light of this, how should Christians react to this news and to homosexuality in general?
With Biblical Conviction
It is our right, nay, our duty to respond with concern about the legalization of same-sex marriage. Biblically, marriage is specifically reserved for one man and one woman as created by God and reflects Christ and His Church (Ephesians 5:22-33). Scripture describes homosexuality as “dishonorable,” “shameless,” and “contrary to nature” (Romans 1:26-27). So, in the eyes of the Christian, there is no such thing as same-sex marriage because that would make Christ and His Church dishonorable, shameless, and contrary to nature.
Culture argues that Christians are merely imposing their bigoted religious convictions on America, but this is not the case with law-making in a pluralistic democracy. Laws in a system of government like ours do not come to pass because of a consensus worldview; rather, they come to pass when multiple worldviews converge in agreement that something is normal for societal health. So to be fair, this is not just a Christian argument, cultures and religions for all of time have agreed that same-sex relations are not normal. There are not enough Christians to overpower the government in a way that bans same-sex marriage. Many atheists and Buddhists and post-modernists alike disagree with same-sex marriage and this is why these laws exist.
As Christians being “in the world but not of it,” we are called to place God’s authority higher than the world’s while simultaneously living under the authority of those God has placed over us. We have the ability to vote, to voice our opinions, and to hold court in the presence of these authorities and that is where we can best try to defend our convictions in a system that will not allow us to dictatorially control it.
With Biblical Compassion
There is a tension that Christians are in the middle of when dealing with the Bible and the government. There are times when a law is passed or a President makes a bold statement that does not align with Scripture. As with abortion, same-sex marriage may be a controversial topic that becomes a national, legal, regular way of life in America. The appropriate response is not hate and venom. The folks at Westboro spew enough hate for the rest of us.
Instead, let us focus on compassion towards homosexuals as this process plays out. We should not condone their actions or bow to Walker and those who support same-sex marriage, but we should love them and pray for them. Homosexuals have souls, just like alcoholics, wife-beaters, gossipers, hypocrites, and you with any multitude of sins that attack you daily. Homosexuality is not its own separate level of sin. I don’t remember seeing in Scripture where God gives a list of sins that He’s more cool with than others. You are no better than they are, you have your own God-hating sin and so do I. You have been saved by grace and this should cause you to have grace for others, not elitism.
Brothers and sisters, this is nothing new. The apostles were no less at odds with their culture and governing authorities than we are today. As they did, we should make God’s Name known even more powerfully through the preaching of the Word, through constant Gospel-centered joy in the face of obstacles, and through prayer for those who need a Savior.